رویکردها، روش ها و اصول طراحی سامانه های اجتماعی -فنی؛ یک مطالعه ی مروری با رویکرد انتقادی

منابع

الف- فارسی

• ‏‫دو پونل، ایبون؛ فرنسن، مارتین؛ ورماس، پیتر؛ هاوکس، ویبو؛ و کروس، پیتر. (۱۳۹۱). «رویکردی در فلسفه‌ی تکنولوژی از مصنوعات تکنیکی تا سیستم‌های اجتماعی - تکنیکی: درس گفتارهایی درباره‌ی مهندسان، تکنولوژی و جامعه». (فرخ کاکائی و مصطفی تقوی، مترجمان). انتشارات اختران کتاب.
• ‏‫محقر، علی؛ انصاری، منوچهر؛ صادقی مقدم، محمدرضا؛ و میرکاظمی مود، محمد. (۱۳۹۷). «ارائه چارچوبی برای ترکیب روش های مدلسازی سیستم های پیچیده فنی-اجتماعی با استفاده از فراترکیب تفسیری انتقادی». چشم انداز مدیریت صنعتی، 8(29)، 9-38.
• ‏‫ملبوس باف رامین؛ و عزیزی فریدون. (۱۳۸۹). «مرور سیستماتیک «Systematic Review» چیست و چگونه نگاشته می شود؟ (مقاله مروری)». پژوهش در پزشکی، 34(3)، 203-207.
• Badham, R.; Clegg, C.; & Wall, T. (2000). Socio-technical theory (( Karwowski, W. (Ed). New York: John Wiley.
• Bots, Pieter W.G. (2007). Design in socio-technical system development: three angles in a common framework. of Design Research, 5(3), 382. https://doi.org/10.1504/JDR.2007.014883
• de Vries, Linda; & Bligård, Lars-Ola. (2019). Visualising safety: The potential for using sociotechnical systems models in prospective safety assessment and design. Safety Science, 111, 80-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.09.003
• Elatlassi, Rime; & Narwankar, Chinmay. (2016). A categorization of socio-technical systems approaches based on context and purpose (Vol. 1). Presented at the Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the ISSS-2016 Boulder, CO, ., USA.
• Grant, Maria J.; & Booth, Andrew. (2009). A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91-108. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
• Hassannezhad, Mohammad; Cantamessa, Marco; & Montagna, Francesca. (2015). Actor-Based Signposting: A Modelling Tool to Improve The Socio-Technical Design Processes. In ResearchGate. Milan, Italy. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.2890.3762
• Hendrick, Hal W. (2009). A Sociotechnical Systems Model of Organizational Complexity and Design and its Relation to Employee Cognitive Complexity. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 53(16), 1028-1032.
• Herrmann, Thomas; Jahnke, Isa; & Nolte, Alexander. (2021). A problem-based approach to the advancement of heuristics for socio-technical evaluation. Behaviour & Information Technology, 0(0), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2021.1972157
• Kyriakidis, Miltos; Kant, Vivek; Amir, Sulfikar; & Dang, Vinh N. (2018). Understanding human performance in sociotechnical systems – Steps towards a generic framework. Safety Science, 107, 202-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.07.008
• Macmillan, Sebastian; Steele, John; Austin, Simon; Kirby, Paul; & Robin Spence. (2001). Development and verification of a generic framework for conceptual design. Design Studies, 22(2), 169-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(00)00025-9
• Mumford, Enid. (2006). The story of socio-technical design: reflections on its successes, failures and potential. Information Systems Journal, 16(4), 317-342. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2006.00221.x
• Oosthuizen, Rudolph; & Pretorius, Leon. (2015). Modelling Methodology for Engineering of Complex Sociotechnical Systems. Wiley Online Library. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-5837.2014.00021.x
• Patole, Sanjay. (2021). Principles and Practice of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. Switzerland: Springer.
• Rudolph, Cort W.; Katz, Ian M.; Ruppel, Regina; & Zacher, Hannes. (2021). A systematic and critical review of research on respect in leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(1), 101492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101492
• Tai, Kuang-Ting. (2021). Open government research over a decade: A systematic review. Government Information Quarterly, 38(2), 101566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101566
• Wahbeh, Abdullah; Sarnikar, Surendra; & El-Gayar, Omar. (2020). A socio-technical-based process for questionnaire development in requirements elicitation via interviews. Requirements Engineering, 25, 295-315. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-019-00324-x