چارچوب تبیین بلوغ ساختاری سازمان مادر در جهت تحقق اقتصاد مقاومتی

فهرست منابع و مآخذ

الف. منابع فارسی

• رحمان­سرشت آ، و فتح‌اللهی، ا (1389). استراتژی‌ها و شیوه‌ها در شرکت‌های مادر. تهران: دوران.
• صنایع مس (1396)، بازیابی از شرکت ملی صنایع مس ایران: nicico.com
• مبینی، م و معمارزاده طهران، غ (1395)، آینده‌پژوهی سازمان‌های دولتی ایران متناسب با الزامات اقتصاد مقاومتی، فصلنامه سیاست‌های راهبردی و کلان.
• مؤمنی، م و فعال قیومی، ع (1391)، تحلیل آماری با استفاده از spss. تهران: گنج شایگان.
• نوفرستی، م (1395)، اقتصاد مقاومتی و راه‌های دستیابی به آن، فصلنامه سیاست‌های راهبردی و کلان.

ب. منابع انگلیسی

• Ahern,D. Clouse, A., & Turner, R. (2004). A Practical Itroduction to Integrated Process Improvement. Addison-Wisley.
• Anthony, J., & Ramesh, K. (1992). Association between accounting performance measures and stock prices:A test of the life cycle hypothesis. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 203-227.
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in psychology . Qualitative Research in Psychology.
• Chandler, A. (1962). Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History Of the American Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge: MIT Press.
• Chrissis, M., Konard, M., & Shrum, S. (2008). Guidlines for Process Integration and Product Improvement. Upper Saddle River,NJ.: Addison-Wisley.
• Churchill, N., & Virginia, L. (1983). The Five Stages of Small Business Growth. Harvard Business Review.
• Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2013). Teaching Thematic Analysis:Overcoming Chalengesand Developing Strategies for Effective Learning. The Psychologist.
• Delmar, F., Davidson, P., & Gartner, W. (2003). Arriving at the High Growth Firm. Journal of Business Venturing.
• Dickinson, V. (2011). Cash flow patterns as a proxy for firm life cycle. The Accounting Review, 1969-1994.
• Dickinson, V. (2011). Cash Flow Patterns as a Proxy for Firm Life Cycle. The Accounting Review.
• Feagin, J., Orum, A., & Sjoberg, G. (1991). A Case for Case Study. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
• Fligstein, N. (2001). The Architecture of Markets:An Economic Sociology of Tweny First Century Capitalist Societies. NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Fraser, P., Moultrie, J., & Gregory, M. (2002). The Use of Maturity Models/Grids as a Tool in Assessing Product Development Capability. IEEE Engineering Management Society, (pp. 244-249). Piscataway.
• Goold a, M., Campbell, A., & Alexander, M. (1994). Corporate-Level Strategy: Creating value in the Multibusiness Company.
• Goold b, M., & Campbell, A. (2002). Parenting in Complex Structures. Long Range Planning, 219-243.
• Goold d, M., & Campbell, A. (2003). Structured Networks: How to Create Enough but not too Much Structure in Your Organization. Ashridge Business School UK, 1-25.
• Goold, M., & Campbell, A. (1989). Strategies & Styles: The role of the Center in Managing Divershfied Corporations. Basil Blackwell.
• Goold, M., & Campbell, A. (2003). Structured Networks: How to Create Enough but not too Much Structure in Your Organization. Ashridge Business School UK, 1-25.
• Hakes, C. (1996). The Corporate Self Assessment Handbook. London: Chapman & Hall.
• Johnson, R., & Scholes, K. (2002). Exploring Corporate Strategy. London: Prentice Hall.
• Kunisch, S., Menz, M., & Ambos, B. (2014). Changes at Corporate Headquarters:Review, Integration and Future Research. International Journal of Management Reviews.
• Levie, j., & Lichtenstein, B. (2008). From Stages of Business Growth to a Dynamic Stages Model of Entrepreneurial Growth and Change. Hunter Centre for Entrepreneurship, University of Strathclyde.
• Menz, M., Kunisch, S., & Collis, D. J. (2013). What Do We Know About Corporate Headquarters? A Review, Integration, and Research Agenda. Harvard Business School Working Paper,, No.14-016.
• Mettler, T., & Rohner, P. (2009). Situational Maturity Moodels as Instrumental Artifacts for Organizational Design.
• Miller, D., & Friesen, P. (1984). Alongitudinal study of revolution in organizational adaptaion. Academy of Management journal, 1161-1183.
• Mintzberg, H. (1983). Structure in fives: Designing Effective Organizations.
• Paulk, M., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M., & Weber, C. (1993). Copability Maturity Model Version 1.1.IEEE Software.
• Penrose, E. (1959). The Theory of the growth of the Firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Pettifer, D., Young, D., & Goold 1, M. (2001). Redesigning the corporate center. European Management Journal, 19(1)
• Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. (1999). Knowing What to Do is not Enough:Turning Knowledge into Action. California Management Review.
• Pyecha, J. (1988). A Case Study of the Application of Noncategorical Special Education in Two States. Chapelhill,NC: Research Triangle Institute.
• Quinn, R., & Cameron, K. (1983). Organizational life cycles and shifting criteria of effectiveness: Some preliminary evidence. Management Science, 33-51.
• Rehman, A., Wang, M., & Yu, H. (2016). Dynamics of financial leverage across firm life cycle in chinese firm: an empirical investigation using dynamic panel data model. china finance and economic review.
• Simpson, J., & Weiner, E. (1989). The Oxford Dictionary. Oxford,UK: Oxford University Press.
• Tellis, W. (1997). Application of Case Study Methodology. The Qualitative Report.
• Valente, B. (2017). Capital Structure and Firm's Life Cycle:An Iberian Study. porto: FEP ECONIMCA E GESTAO.
• Villalonga, B. (2004). Does Diversification Cause the Diversification Discount? Finantial Management 33(2), 5-27.
• Yin, R. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods(2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks,CA: Sage Publishing.