کاربرد توان تحلیلی هوش مصنوعی در تثبیت سازوکار امنیت جمعی و ثبات بین‌المللی

منابع

الف- فارسی

• باقری دولت آبادی, علی .  (1403).  تاثیر هوش مصنوعی بر نظریه های جریان اصلی روابط بین‌الملل.  فصلنامه علمی راهبرد سیاسی, 8(1), 7-27.  
• برچیل،اسکات. (1395). نظریه‌های روابط بین‌الملل.  تهران:انتشارات دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی
• بیگدلی, محمدرضا . (1403). نقش جامعه‌پذیری بین‌المللی در تحکیم الگوی امنیت جمعی و ثبات امنیت بین‌الملل.  پژوهش های روابط بین‌الملل, 14(3), 97-123.
• بیگدلی,محمدرضا,خبیری,کابک. (1396). تأثیر سیاست خارجی دولت ترامپ بر مکانیزم امنیت دسته‌جمعی. مطالعات روابط بین‌الملل,40(10),9-38.
• ترسلی, احمدرضا , محمدی منفرد, حسن و موحدی صفت, محمدرضا. (1403).  کاربرد هوش مصنوعی در بهبود فرآیند جمع ‏آوری و تحلیل اطلاعات.  مطالعات بین‌ رشته‌ای دانش راهبردی.  (56)14، 277-303.
• حافظ‌نیا، محمدرضا. (1391).  مقدمه ای بر روش تحقیق در علوم انسانی.  تهران: انتشارات سمت.
• حسینی, سید امیر علی و هاشمی زاده, سید علیرضا. (1402).  هوش مصنوعی و صلح و امنیت بین‌المللی.  پژوهش های روابط بین‌الملل, 13(2), 325-345.
• دهقانی‌فیروزآبادی،سید جلال. (1395). کلیات روابط بین‌الملل. تهران:نشر مخاطب
• سنجابی، علیرضا.  (1379). نظریه امنیت جمعی.  فصلنامه کنترولر، سال سوم، شماره 9 و 10
• عبداله‌خانی،علی. (1389). نظریه های امنیت. تهران:انتشارات ابرار معاصر
• عین القضاتی, علیرضا , پیکرنگار, عبدا. . .  و شعبانی فر, محمد .  (1397).  شناسایی عوامل موثر بر ایجاد جامعه سبز، هوشمند و پشتیبانی از تولید ملی با تاکید بر علوم و فناوری‌های نوین همگرا.  مطالعات بین‌ رشته‌ای دانش راهبردی،(32)8. ،157-183.
• قوام، عبدالعلی. (1393). کاربرد نظریه های روابط بین‌الملل. تهران:انتشارات دنیای اقتصاد
• گریفیتس،مارتین. روچ، استیون. سولومون، اسکات. (1393). پنجاه متفکر بزرگ روابط بین‌الملل.  ترجمه علیرضا طیب.  تهران:نشر نی
• مک ناب، دیوید.  (1394).  روش تحقیق در علوم سیاسی.  ترجمه معاونت پژوهش و تولید، تهران: انتشارات دانشکده اطلاعات.
• ونت، الکساندر. ( 1392). نظریه اجتماعى سیاست بین‌الملل، ترجمه حمیرا مشیرزاده،تهران: دفترمطالعات سیاسى و بین المللى مرکز چاپ وانتشارات وزارت امورخارجه.

ب- انگلیسی

• Amaresh, P. (2020).  Artificial Intelligence: A New driving horse in International Relations and Diplomacy.  Diplomatist.  https://diplomatist. com/2020/05/13/artificial-intelligence-a-new-driving-horse-in-international-relations-and-diplomacy/
• Albakri, M. , Bello, M. , & Al Rashdi, S.  (2025). Digital transformation and cybersecurity fears on national security in GCC.  In Perspectives on digital transformation in contemporary business (pp.  25-60).  IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
• Bode, I. (2024).  AI Technologies and International Relations: Do We Need New Analytical Frameworks?. The RUSI Journal, 169(5), 66-74.
• Brundage, M. , Avin, S. , Clark, J. , Toner, H. , Eckersley, P. , Garfinkel, B. , . . .  & Amodei, D.  (2018). The malicious use of artificial intelligence: Forecasting, prevention, and mitigation.  arXiv preprint arXiv:1802. 07228.
• Carlson, W.  (2020). Increasing Access to Justice through Online Dispute Resolution.  IJODR, 7, 17.
• Cavelty, M.  D.  (2019). The politics of cybersecurity: Balancing different roles of the state.  St Antony's International Review, 15(1), 37-57.
• Crootof, R. , & Ard, B.  J. (2021). The Future of International Law in an AI Era.  AJIL.
• Cummings, M.  L. , Roff, H.  M. , Cukier, K. , Parakilas, J. , & Bryce, H.  (2018).  Artificial Intelligence and International Affairs Disruption Anticipated.  Chatham House Report.  International Security Department & US and the Americas Programme.  L. : The Royal Institute of International Affairs.
• Cowls, J. , Tsamados, A. ,Taddeo, M. , & Floridi, L. (2023). The AI gambit: leveraging artificial intelligence to combat climate change—opportunities, challenges, and recommendations.  Ai & Society, 1-25.
• Das, K.  P. , & Chandra, J.  (2023). A survey on artificial intelligence for reducing the climate footprint in healthcare.  Energy Nexus, 9, 100167.
• Dulka, A. (2022).  The use of artificial intelligence in international human rights law.  Stan.  Tech.  L.  Rev. , 26, 316.
• Everhart, J. , Kotecha, M. , & Thakur, K. (2025).  Security Issues with Crypto The Bank Secrecy Act, Anti–Money Laundering, and Countering the Financing of Terrorism.  https://www. brettonwoods. org/sites/default/files/documents/BWC-Brief7-Crypto-Security_FNL-web. pdf
• Esiefarienrhe, B.  M. , & Maine, I.  M.  (2024). Artificial Intelligence and the Electoral Process: The Benefits and the Challenges.  African Journal of Development Studies (formerly AFFRIKA Journal of Politics, Economics and Society), 2024(si1), 213-226.
• Enisa. (2023).  The European Union Agency for Cybersecurity Threat Landscape Report 2023.  enisa. europa. euhttps://www. enisa. europa. eu/publications/enisa-threat-landscape-2023
• European Parliament. (2020). The ethics of artificial intelligence: Issues and initiatives.
• Gardner,Ann Marie. (2022). What are Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML)?.  climat etrace.  
• Gill,AS. (2019). Artificial Intelligence and International Security: The Long View.  Ethics & International Affairs.  2019;33(2):169-179.
• Gilli,A. ,Gilli,M. ,Leonard,A. S. ,&Stanley-Lockman,Z. (2022). NATO-Mation": Strategies for Leading in the Age of Artificial Intelligence.  NATO Defense College.
• Griffiths,M. (2007). International Relations Theory for the Twenty-First Century.  In Routledge eBooks.
• GUIEU,Jean-Michel. (2020). Guaranteeing Peace through “Collective Security” in the 20th Century.  Encyclopédie D’histoire Numérique De L’Europe. https://ehne. fr/en/encyclopedia/themes/internationalrelations/organizing-internationalsystem/guaranteeing-peace-through-%E2%80%9Ccollective-security%E2%80%9D-in 20th-century
• Goodwin,B. (2023).  Crypto-Asset Activity Risk and BSA/AML Regulatory Awareness. Richmondfed. org; Supervision News Flash.  https://www. richmondfed. org/banking/banker_resources/regulatory_perspectives/news_flash/2023/202308_crypto_asset_risk
• Hoopman,T. (2010). The logic of habit in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations, 16(4), 539–561.
• Haasnoot,M. ,Van’tKlooster,S. ,&VanAlphen,J. (2018). Designing a monitoring system to detect signals to adapt to uncertain climate change.  Global environmental change, 52, 273-285.
• Horowitz, M.  C. , Allen, G.  C. , Saravalle, E. , Cho, A. , Frederick, K. , & Scharre, P.  (2022).  Artificial intelligence and international security.  Center for a New American Security. .  
• ICJ Annual Report. (2023). Advocacy, Independence of Judges and Lawyers, UN Mechanisms.  International Commission of Jurists.  https://www. icj. org/resource/icj-annual-report-2023/
• Johnson,J. (2019). Artificial intelligence & future warfare: implications for international security.  Defense & Security Analysis, 35(2), 147–169.  
• Johnson,J. (2020). Artificial intelligence in nuclear warfare: a perfect storm of instability?.  The Washington Quarterly, 43(2), 197-211.
• Jung,Hoyoon. (2019). The Evolution of Social Constructivism in Political Science: Past to Present.  SAGE Open 9 (1): 1–10.
• Kang, Y. ,&Jeong,Y. (2022). Nuclear Activity Detecting Methodology Using Artificial Intelligence.  Nuclear Safety Research Program through the Korea Foundation Of Nuclear Safety (KoFONS).
• Lahutina,S. ,Frankova,I. ,Gruen,M. ,Vermetten, E. , Zohar, J. , Spitschan, M. , & Bajbouj, M. (2024). A digital self-help tool to promote mental well-being for Ukrainians affected by war-Assessing predictors of stress.  Neuroscience Applied, 3, 104089.
• Katzenstein,P. J. (1996). The culture of national security: Norms and identity in world politics.  Columbia University Press.
• Maheshwari,S. &,Chatnani,N. (2023). Applications of artificial intelligence and Machine learning-based supervisory technology in financial Markets surveillance: A review of literature. FIIB Business Review, 23197145231189990.
• Meleouni,C. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and its Impact in International Relations.  Journal of politics and ethics in new technologies and AI, 2(1).
• Meltzer,J. P. ,& Kerry,C. F. (2021). Strengthening international cooperation on artificial intelligence. Brookings.  https://www. brookings. edu/research/strengthening-international-cooperation-on-artificial-intelligence/
• Jalli.  &. Martinez. (2025). Artificial Intelligence is Intensifying South China Sea Disputes in the Philippines.  ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute. https://fulcrum. sg/artificial-intelligence-is-intensifying-south-china-sea-disputes-in-the-philippines/
• Moore, A. (2023).  How AI Could Revolutionize Diplomacy.  Foreign Policy.  Foreignpolicy. https://foreignpolicy. com/2023/03/21/ai-artificial-intelligence-diplomacy-negotiations-chatgpt-quantum-computing/
• Perricos, C. ,&Kapur,V. (2019).  Anticipatory government: Preempting problems through predictive analytics.  Deloitte Insights: Government Trends 2020, 41-47.  
• Pizzi,M. ,Romanoff, M. ,& Engelhardt,T. (2020). AI for humanitarian action: Human rights and ethics.  International Review of the Red Cross, 102(913), 145-180.
• Raj, M. , Khan, H. , Kathuria, S. , Chanti, Y. , & Sahu, M. (2024).  The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Anti-Money Laundering (AML).  In 2024 3rd International Conference on Sentiment Analysis and Deep Learning (ICSADL) (pp.  272-277).  IEEE.
• Russell, S. , & Norvig, P. (2020).  Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (4th ed. ).  Pearson.
• Scharre, P. , & Lamberth, M.  (2022).  Artificial intelligence and arms control.  arXiv preprint arXiv:2211. 00065.  Shelepov, A. (2022).  The Influence of the G20’s digitalization leadership on development conditions and governance of the digital economy.  International Organisations Research Journal, 17(1).
• Stanzel,V. ,Voelsen,D. (2022). Diplomacy and artificial intelligence: reflections on practical assistance for diplomatic negotiations.
• Stephens,S. (2023). Underfunded and Underappreciated:UNFCCC's Technology Mechanism and the Need for Stable Funding.  Ariz.  J.  Env't L.  & Pol'y, 14, 96.
• Sweijs,T. ,Romansky,S. (2024).  International norms development and AI in the military domain.  (No.  300). CIGI Papers.
• Theys, S.  (2018).  Introducing constructivism in international relations theory.  E-International Relations, 23(5), 79-83.  
• Wang,Jieshu. (2018). The Early History of Artificial Intelligence in China (1950s– 1980s).  Annual Meeting of the Society for the History of Technology (SHOT), St.  Louis, MO.
• Wendt, A.  (2004). The state as person in international theory. Review of International Studies,30(2),289–316.  
• Wendt,Alexander. (1999). Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge UP.
• Yost,David. (1977). NATO Transformed:The Alliance's New Roles in International Security. Leicester UP.
• Zheng, S. ,Trott, A. , Srinivasa, S. , Parkes, D.  C. , & Socher, R. (2022).  The AI Economist: Taxation policy design via two-level deep multiagent reinforcement learning.  Science advances, 8(18), eabk2607.
• Zhang ,Xinjun. (2024). The 2022 ICJ Judgment in Nicaragua v.  Colombia: Towards a Theory of Exclusivity in Allocating Rights and Jurisdiction between the Coastal and Other States?. Chinese Journal of International Law, Volume 23, Issue 2, June 2024, Pages 223–262, https://doi. org/10. 1093/chinesejil/jmae019
• Zubair, M. , Radkiany,R. ,Akram,Y. ,&Ahmed, E. (2024). Nuclear safeguards: technology, challenges, and future perspectives.  Alexandria Engineering Journal, 108, 188-205.
• Zwetsloot, R. ,&Dafoe,A. (2023). Thinking about risks from AI: Accidents, misuse and structure.  Lawfare.