The application of the analytical power of artificial intelligence in stabilizing the mechanism of collective security and international stability

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

PhD in International Relations ,Faculty of Law ,Theology and Political Sciences ,Science and Research Unit, Islamic Azad University

Abstract

Artificial intelligence, as an emerging phenomenon, has transformed various aspects of human social life and, as an independent variable, has affected traditional practices governing international relations, including various levels of security. Accordingly, the present study seeks to answer the key question of how artificial intelligence can maintain the stability of international security?The present study is based on the hypothesis that artificial intelligence, by building common perceptions and institutionalizing international norms, can stabilize international security by strengthening and stabilizing the mechanism of the collective security model.This research, in the form of a descriptive-analytical method, using the theoretical framework of constructivism, due to the emphasis of constructivists on the co-evolutionary role of perceptions and norms in shaping behavior and ultimately the interests and identity of states, argues that the triple application of analytical, predictive, and operational artificial intelligence through big data analysis can, on the one hand, create a common understanding of the concept of security, and on the other hand, lead to the institutionalization of international norms and strengthening the position of international organizations among states.Based on the results obtained, the use of artificial intelligence by governments and international institutions as a strategic tool can, by establishing common norms, shape collective identity and realize a security community among governments. This process will strengthen the collective security mechanism as a model for maintaining international security, including global consensus and legal institutions for decision-making and implementation.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  • منابع

    الف- فارسی

    • باقری دولت آبادی, علی .  (1403).  تاثیر هوش مصنوعی بر نظریه های جریان اصلی روابط بین‌الملل.  فصلنامه علمی راهبرد سیاسی, 8(1), 7-27.  
    • برچیل،اسکات. (1395). نظریه‌های روابط بین‌الملل.  تهران:انتشارات دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی
    • بیگدلی, محمدرضا . (1403). نقش جامعه‌پذیری بین‌المللی در تحکیم الگوی امنیت جمعی و ثبات امنیت بین‌الملل.  پژوهش های روابط بین‌الملل, 14(3), 97-123.
    • بیگدلی,محمدرضا,خبیری,کابک. (1396). تأثیر سیاست خارجی دولت ترامپ بر مکانیزم امنیت دسته‌جمعی. مطالعات روابط بین‌الملل,40(10),9-38.
    • ترسلی, احمدرضا , محمدی منفرد, حسن و موحدی صفت, محمدرضا. (1403).  کاربرد هوش مصنوعی در بهبود فرآیند جمع ‏آوری و تحلیل اطلاعات.  مطالعات بین‌ رشته‌ای دانش راهبردی.  (56)14، 277-303.
    • حافظ‌نیا، محمدرضا. (1391).  مقدمه ای بر روش تحقیق در علوم انسانی.  تهران: انتشارات سمت.
    • حسینی, سید امیر علی و هاشمی زاده, سید علیرضا. (1402).  هوش مصنوعی و صلح و امنیت بین‌المللی.  پژوهش های روابط بین‌الملل, 13(2), 325-345.
    • دهقانی‌فیروزآبادی،سید جلال. (1395). کلیات روابط بین‌الملل. تهران:نشر مخاطب
    • سنجابی، علیرضا.  (1379). نظریه امنیت جمعی.  فصلنامه کنترولر، سال سوم، شماره 9 و 10
    • عبداله‌خانی،علی. (1389). نظریه های امنیت. تهران:انتشارات ابرار معاصر
    • عین القضاتی, علیرضا , پیکرنگار, عبدا. . .  و شعبانی فر, محمد .  (1397).  شناسایی عوامل موثر بر ایجاد جامعه سبز، هوشمند و پشتیبانی از تولید ملی با تاکید بر علوم و فناوری‌های نوین همگرا.  مطالعات بین‌ رشته‌ای دانش راهبردی،(32)8. ،157-183.
    • قوام، عبدالعلی. (1393). کاربرد نظریه های روابط بین‌الملل. تهران:انتشارات دنیای اقتصاد
    • گریفیتس،مارتین. روچ، استیون. سولومون، اسکات. (1393). پنجاه متفکر بزرگ روابط بین‌الملل.  ترجمه علیرضا طیب.  تهران:نشر نی
    • مک ناب، دیوید.  (1394).  روش تحقیق در علوم سیاسی.  ترجمه معاونت پژوهش و تولید، تهران: انتشارات دانشکده اطلاعات.
    • ونت، الکساندر. ( 1392). نظریه اجتماعى سیاست بین‌الملل، ترجمه حمیرا مشیرزاده،تهران: دفترمطالعات سیاسى و بین المللى مرکز چاپ وانتشارات وزارت امورخارجه.

    ب- انگلیسی

     

    • Amaresh, P. (2020).  Artificial Intelligence: A New driving horse in International Relations and Diplomacy.  Diplomatist.  https://diplomatist. com/2020/05/13/artificial-intelligence-a-new-driving-horse-in-international-relations-and-diplomacy/
    • Albakri, M. , Bello, M. , & Al Rashdi, S.  (2025). Digital transformation and cybersecurity fears on national security in GCC.  In Perspectives on digital transformation in contemporary business (pp.  25-60).  IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
    • Bode, I. (2024).  AI Technologies and International Relations: Do We Need New Analytical Frameworks?. The RUSI Journal, 169(5), 66-74.
    • Brundage, M. , Avin, S. , Clark, J. , Toner, H. , Eckersley, P. , Garfinkel, B. , . . .  & Amodei, D.  (2018). The malicious use of artificial intelligence: Forecasting, prevention, and mitigation.  arXiv preprint arXiv:1802. 07228.
    • Carlson, W.  (2020). Increasing Access to Justice through Online Dispute Resolution.  IJODR, 7, 17.
    • Cavelty, M.  D.  (2019). The politics of cybersecurity: Balancing different roles of the state.  St Antony's International Review, 15(1), 37-57.
    • Crootof, R. , & Ard, B.  J. (2021). The Future of International Law in an AI Era.  AJIL.
    • Cummings, M.  L. , Roff, H.  M. , Cukier, K. , Parakilas, J. , & Bryce, H.  (2018).  Artificial Intelligence and International Affairs Disruption Anticipated.  Chatham House Report.  International Security Department & US and the Americas Programme.  L. : The Royal Institute of International Affairs.
    • Cowls, J. , Tsamados, A. ,Taddeo, M. , & Floridi, L. (2023). The AI gambit: leveraging artificial intelligence to combat climate change—opportunities, challenges, and recommendations.  Ai & Society, 1-25.
    • Das, K.  P. , & Chandra, J.  (2023). A survey on artificial intelligence for reducing the climate footprint in healthcare.  Energy Nexus, 9, 100167.
    • Dulka, A. (2022).  The use of artificial intelligence in international human rights law.  Stan.  Tech.  L.  Rev. , 26, 316.
    • Everhart, J. , Kotecha, M. , & Thakur, K. (2025).  Security Issues with Crypto The Bank Secrecy Act, Anti–Money Laundering, and Countering the Financing of Terrorism.  https://www. brettonwoods. org/sites/default/files/documents/BWC-Brief7-Crypto-Security_FNL-web. pdf
    • Esiefarienrhe, B.  M. , & Maine, I.  M.  (2024). Artificial Intelligence and the Electoral Process: The Benefits and the Challenges.  African Journal of Development Studies (formerly AFFRIKA Journal of Politics, Economics and Society), 2024(si1), 213-226.
    • Enisa. (2023).  The European Union Agency for Cybersecurity Threat Landscape Report 2023.  enisa. europa. euhttps://www. enisa. europa. eu/publications/enisa-threat-landscape-2023
    • European Parliament. (2020). The ethics of artificial intelligence: Issues and initiatives.
    • Gardner,Ann Marie. (2022). What are Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML)?.  climat etrace.  
    • Gill,AS. (2019). Artificial Intelligence and International Security: The Long View.  Ethics & International Affairs.  2019;33(2):169-179.
    • Gilli,A. ,Gilli,M. ,Leonard,A. S. ,&Stanley-Lockman,Z. (2022). NATO-Mation": Strategies for Leading in the Age of Artificial Intelligence.  NATO Defense College.
    • Griffiths,M. (2007). International Relations Theory for the Twenty-First Century.  In Routledge eBooks.
    • GUIEU,Jean-Michel. (2020). Guaranteeing Peace through “Collective Security” in the 20th Century.  Encyclopédie D’histoire Numérique De L’Europe. https://ehne. fr/en/encyclopedia/themes/internationalrelations/organizing-internationalsystem/guaranteeing-peace-through-%E2%80%9Ccollective-security%E2%80%9D-in 20th-century
    • Goodwin,B. (2023).  Crypto-Asset Activity Risk and BSA/AML Regulatory Awareness. Richmondfed. org; Supervision News Flash.  https://www. richmondfed. org/banking/banker_resources/regulatory_perspectives/news_flash/2023/202308_crypto_asset_risk
    • Hoopman,T. (2010). The logic of habit in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations, 16(4), 539–561.
    • Haasnoot,M. ,Van’tKlooster,S. ,&VanAlphen,J. (2018). Designing a monitoring system to detect signals to adapt to uncertain climate change.  Global environmental change, 52, 273-285.
    • Horowitz, M.  C. , Allen, G.  C. , Saravalle, E. , Cho, A. , Frederick, K. , & Scharre, P.  (2022).  Artificial intelligence and international security.  Center for a New American Security. .  
    • ICJ Annual Report. (2023). Advocacy, Independence of Judges and Lawyers, UN Mechanisms.  International Commission of Jurists.  https://www. icj. org/resource/icj-annual-report-2023/
    • Johnson,J. (2019). Artificial intelligence & future warfare: implications for international security.  Defense & Security Analysis, 35(2), 147–169.  
    • Johnson,J. (2020). Artificial intelligence in nuclear warfare: a perfect storm of instability?.  The Washington Quarterly, 43(2), 197-211.
    • Jung,Hoyoon. (2019). The Evolution of Social Constructivism in Political Science: Past to Present.  SAGE Open 9 (1): 1–10.
    • Kang, Y. ,&Jeong,Y. (2022). Nuclear Activity Detecting Methodology Using Artificial Intelligence.  Nuclear Safety Research Program through the Korea Foundation Of Nuclear Safety (KoFONS).
    • Lahutina,S. ,Frankova,I. ,Gruen,M. ,Vermetten, E. , Zohar, J. , Spitschan, M. , & Bajbouj, M. (2024). A digital self-help tool to promote mental well-being for Ukrainians affected by war-Assessing predictors of stress.  Neuroscience Applied, 3, 104089.
    • Katzenstein,P. J. (1996). The culture of national security: Norms and identity in world politics.  Columbia University Press.
    • Maheshwari,S. &,Chatnani,N. (2023). Applications of artificial intelligence and Machine learning-based supervisory technology in financial Markets surveillance: A review of literature. FIIB Business Review, 23197145231189990.
    • Meleouni,C. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and its Impact in International Relations.  Journal of politics and ethics in new technologies and AI, 2(1).
    • Meltzer,J. P. ,& Kerry,C. F. (2021). Strengthening international cooperation on artificial intelligence. Brookings.  https://www. brookings. edu/research/strengthening-international-cooperation-on-artificial-intelligence/
    • Jalli.  &. Martinez. (2025). Artificial Intelligence is Intensifying South China Sea Disputes in the Philippines.  ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute. https://fulcrum. sg/artificial-intelligence-is-intensifying-south-china-sea-disputes-in-the-philippines/
    • Moore, A. (2023).  How AI Could Revolutionize Diplomacy.  Foreign Policy.  Foreignpolicy. https://foreignpolicy. com/2023/03/21/ai-artificial-intelligence-diplomacy-negotiations-chatgpt-quantum-computing/
    • Perricos, C. ,&Kapur,V. (2019).  Anticipatory government: Preempting problems through predictive analytics.  Deloitte Insights: Government Trends 2020, 41-47.  
    • Pizzi,M. ,Romanoff, M. ,& Engelhardt,T. (2020). AI for humanitarian action: Human rights and ethics.  International Review of the Red Cross, 102(913), 145-180.
    • Raj, M. , Khan, H. , Kathuria, S. , Chanti, Y. , & Sahu, M. (2024).  The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Anti-Money Laundering (AML).  In 2024 3rd International Conference on Sentiment Analysis and Deep Learning (ICSADL) (pp.  272-277).  IEEE.
    • Russell, S. , & Norvig, P. (2020).  Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (4th ed. ).  Pearson.
    • Scharre, P. , & Lamberth, M.  (2022).  Artificial intelligence and arms control.  arXiv preprint arXiv:2211. 00065.  Shelepov, A. (2022).  The Influence of the G20’s digitalization leadership on development conditions and governance of the digital economy.  International Organisations Research Journal, 17(1).
    • Stanzel,V. ,Voelsen,D. (2022). Diplomacy and artificial intelligence: reflections on practical assistance for diplomatic negotiations.
    • Stephens,S. (2023). Underfunded and Underappreciated:UNFCCC's Technology Mechanism and the Need for Stable Funding.  Ariz.  J.  Env't L.  & Pol'y, 14, 96.
    • Sweijs,T. ,Romansky,S. (2024).  International norms development and AI in the military domain.  (No.  300). CIGI Papers.
    • Theys, S.  (2018).  Introducing constructivism in international relations theory.  E-International Relations, 23(5), 79-83.  
    • Wang,Jieshu. (2018). The Early History of Artificial Intelligence in China (1950s– 1980s).  Annual Meeting of the Society for the History of Technology (SHOT), St.  Louis, MO.
    • Wendt, A.  (2004). The state as person in international theory. Review of International Studies,30(2),289–316.  
    • Wendt,Alexander. (1999). Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge UP.
    • Yost,David. (1977). NATO Transformed:The Alliance's New Roles in International Security. Leicester UP.
    • Zheng, S. ,Trott, A. , Srinivasa, S. , Parkes, D.  C. , & Socher, R. (2022).  The AI Economist: Taxation policy design via two-level deep multiagent reinforcement learning.  Science advances, 8(18), eabk2607.
    • Zhang ,Xinjun. (2024). The 2022 ICJ Judgment in Nicaragua v.  Colombia: Towards a Theory of Exclusivity in Allocating Rights and Jurisdiction between the Coastal and Other States?. Chinese Journal of International Law, Volume 23, Issue 2, June 2024, Pages 223–262, https://doi. org/10. 1093/chinesejil/jmae019
    • Zubair, M. , Radkiany,R. ,Akram,Y. ,&Ahmed, E. (2024). Nuclear safeguards: technology, challenges, and future perspectives.  Alexandria Engineering Journal, 108, 188-205.
    • Zwetsloot, R. ,&Dafoe,A. (2023). Thinking about risks from AI: Accidents, misuse and structure.  Lawfare.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics