comparison of the Islamic Republic of Iran with a selected of European countries with a moderate level of innovation in terms of technological capabilities

Document Type : Research Paper

Abstract

countries have different understanding of their technological needs. However, they all have one thing in common, which is their need for establishing, maintaining and improving technological. The main purpose of the present research has been compare the Iran and several European countries with moderate levels of innovation in terms of technological capabilities. The research has also aimed at identifying the points the Iran should focus on in order to improve its technological capabilities. To that end, in the first, the available literature on technological capabilities was reviewed and indicators of technological capabilities were extracted. In the second phase, the data needed were extracted from international reports. In the third phase, the indicators identified for evaluating technological capabilities were weighed using analytic hierarchy process. In the fourth phase, the countries were ranked using TOPSIS, and the status of the Iran in terms of technological capabilities was identified in comparison with them in order to identify the points Iran should focus on in order to improve its technological capabilities. The results indicated that from among the ten countries studied, Italy, Spain, and Iran are the first three ones and Portugal, Ukraine, and Greece occupied the eighth, ninth, and tenth position.The results furthermore indicated that the Iran has a suitable status in terms of Scientific & technical articles, patents, Tertiary education, and ICT infrastructure; however, in order to promote its technological capabilities, it should focus on producing and high-tech products, the number of full-time researchers, and Expenditure on research and development.

Keywords


  • منابع

    • فرتوک زاده، حمیدرضا؛ طهماسبی، سیامک؛ اصلی‌پور، حسین؛ بوشهری، علیرضا و توکلی، غلامرضا (1399). الگوی تدوین راهبردهای قابلیت محور در سازمان صنایع دریایی با رویکرد آینده پژوهی. مطالعات بین‌ رشته‌ای دانش راهبردی. 10 (38). 191-161
    • میرجلیلی، سیدحسین؛ حسینی، سیدشمس‌الدین وعبدی، یوسف (1397). بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر توسعه صادرات محصولات دانش بنیان (با فناوری بالا) در کشورهای منتخب. مطالعات بین‌ رشته‌ای دانش راهبردی. 8 (33). 144-115.

     

    • Ali, T. M., Bashir, T., & Kiani, A. K. (2015). Assessment of technological capabilities of OIC countries. Science, Technology and Society, 20(1), 114-131.
    • Archibugi, D., & Coco, A. (2004). A new indicator of technological capabilities for developed and developing countries (ArCo). World Development, 32(4), 629-654.
    • Archibugi, D., & Coco, A. (2005). Measuring technological capabilities at the country level: A survey and a menu for choice. Research policy, 34(2), 175-194.
    • Archibugi, D., Denni, M., & Filippetti, A. (2009). The technological capabilities of nations: The state of the art of synthetic indicators. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(7), 917-931.
    • Archibugi, D., & Filippetti, A. (Eds.). (2015). The handbook of global science, technology, and innovation. John Wiley & Sons.
    • Belhadi, A., Touriki, F. E., & El Fezazi, S. (2017). Prioritizing the solutions of lean implementation in SMEs to overcome its barriers: An integrated fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS approach. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 28(8), 1115-1139.
    • Cerulli, G. (2014). The impact of technological capabilities on invention: an investigation based on country responsiveness scores. World Development, 59, 147-165.
    • Cornell University, INSEAD, and WIPO (2013-2018): The Global Innovation Index 2013-2018: Innovation Feeding the World, Ithaca, Fontainebleau, and Geneva. https://www.globalinnovationindex.org
    • Desai, M., Fukuda-Parr, S., Johansson, C., & Sagasti, F. (2002). Measuring the technology achievement of nations and the capacity to participate in the network age. Journal of Human Development, 3(1), 95-122.
    • Dutrénit, G., Natera, J. M., Anyul, M. P., & Vera-Cruz, A. O. (2018). Development profiles and accumulation of technological capabilities in Latin America. Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    • European Commission (2018), The European Innovation Scoreboard (EIS),Retrievedfrom‌http://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/innovation/facts-figures/scoreboards_en
    • Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Methods for multiple attribute decision making. In Multiple attribute decision making (pp. 58-191). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.‏
    • Khayyat, N. T., & Lee, J. D. (2015). A measure of technological capabilities for developing countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 92, 210-223.‏
    • Kim, L. (2001). The dynamics of technological learning in industrialisation. International Social Science Journal, 53(168), 297-308.
    • Lall, S. (1992). Technological capabilities and industrialization. World development, 20(2), 165-186.
    • Molina-Domene, M. A., & Pietrobelli, C. (2012). Drivers of technological capabilities in developing countries: An econometric analysis of Argentina, Brazil and Chile. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 23(4), 504-515.‏
    • Vlčková, J. A. N. A. (2015). Can exports be used as an indicator of technological capabilities of countries?. Geography: Journal of Czech Geographical Society, 120(3), 314-329.
    • Wagner, C., Horlings, E., & Dutta, A. (2004). A Science and Technology Capacity Index: Input for Decision Making. The Hague: Rand Corporation.
    • World Economic Forum (WEF). 2017. The Global Competitiveness Report 2017–2018. Geneva, Switzerland: WEF. https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-competitiveness report-2017-2018.
    • Zavadskas, E. K., Mardani, A., Turskis, Z., Jusoh, A., & Nor, K. M. (2016). Development of TOPSIS method to solve complicated decision-making problems—An overview on developments from 2000 to 2015. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 15(03), 645-682.