Deputy Chancellor for Research on the Air Defense of Khatam-al-Anbia (pbuh)
Abstract
The main purpose of the present research is to investigate the role of distributional cognition on team performance in dynamic and high-risk environments. The research method was mixed (quantitative and qualitative), and the statistical society in the qualitative stage, experts in the field of cognitive psychology and experts in this field, which was selected on the basis of the judiciary sampling method of 26 people. In the quantitative stage, the statistical population of the study included operational staff in one From the air defense operations centers in Tehran, 135 people were randomly selected using the Morgan table. To collect data, Delphi technique and questionnaire were used. Researcher-made questionnaire on Distributed cognition, Environmental Dynamics and Team Performance (2004) was performed on subjects. Their validity has been proven by experts and professors. The data were analyzed using the statistical method of structural equation modeling using AMOS software. The fitting indices of the model were extracted and the results of the present study showed the optimal fit of the model and was confirmed. The results of the research showed that the distribution of knowledge with the highest impact factor (0.79) on team performance and environmental dynamics with the lowest impact factor (0.35) on team performance as well as cognitive distribution with environmental dynamics were negatively correlated (0.46) ) Were significant and finally, cognitive distribution along with environmental dynamics explained 0.69 of team performance changes
سیف، علی‌اکبر (1394) تغییر رفتار و رفتاردرمانی (نظریهها و روشها)، بیستم، نشر دوران، تهران.
عسکری، احمد؛ ابراهیمی، برات؛ پارسا، پرویز و فاندیز، حسین (1397)، شناسایی و تحلیل عوامل مؤثر بر تحول در ساختار سازمان‌های نظامی، فصلنامه مدیریت نظامی دانشگاه امام علی(ع)، سال هجدهم، شماره 3.
عسکری ، احمد و ابراهیمی، برات (1397)، علوم شناختی در سازمان، انتشارات قرارگاه پدافند هوایی خاتم‌الانبیاء (ص)، تهران.
Bardone, E. & Secchi, D. (2009). Distributed cognition: A research agenda for management. In M. A. Rahim (Ed.), Current Topics in Management. Organizational Behavior, Performance, and Effectiveness, volume 14 (pp. 183-207). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Bechtel ,W.,and A.Abrahamsen,2002.Conectionism and the mind: parallel processing,dynamics,and evolution in networks.2nd ed.Oxford:Basil Blackwel.
Blackburn, T., Swatman, P.A., & Vernik, R. (2006). Cognitive Dust: Linking CSCW Theories to Creative Design Processes.
Bourbousson J., Poizat G., Saury J., Seve C. (2011). Description of dynamic shared knowledge: an exploratory study during a competitive team sports interaction. Ergonomics 54 120–138.
Bermudes,Jose Luise,(2016).Cognitive Science and introduction to the science of mind, Cambridge university.
Bergman,M.,J,H.Moor,and J.Nelson.2003. The logic book.4th ed. Columbus ohio: McGraw-Hill
Cooke N. J., Gorman J. C., Myers C. W., Duran J. L. (2013). Interactive team cognition. Cogn. Sci. 37 255–285. 10.1111/cogs.12009 [PubMed] [CrossRef].
Cooren, F., Vaara, E., Langley, A., & Tsoukas, H. (Eds.) (2014). Language and communication at work: discourse, narrativity and organizing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clark A., Chalmers D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis 58 7–19.
Clark A. (2001a). Mindware: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Cognitive Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clancey, W. J. (1997). Situated Cognition: On Human Knowledge and Computer Representations. Cambridge, England: Cambridget University Press.
Davidson,R.J.,K.R.Scherer,and H.H.Goldsmith,2003.Handbook of effective science.NewYork: Oxford university press.
DeChurch L. A., Mesmer-Magnus J. R. (2010a). Measuring shared team mental models: a meta-analysis. Group Dyn. 14 1–14. 10.1037/a0017455 [CrossRef]
Duff, M. C., Mutlu, B., Byom, L., & Turkstra, L. S. (2012). Beyond utterances: distributed cognition as a framework for studying discourse in adults with acquired brain injury. Seminars in speech and language, 33(1), 44-54.
Heylighen, Francis & HEATH, Margeret & Van Overwalle, Frank. (2004). The Emergence of Distributed Cognition: a conceptual framework.
John E. Mathieu, F. Goodwin Pennsylvania, Tonia S. Heffner, Eduardo Salas and Janis A. Cannon-Bowers,The Influence of Shared Mental Models on Team Process and Performance,Journal of Applied Psychology Copyright 2000 by the American Psychological Association, Inc. 2000, VoL 85, No. 2, 273-283 0021-9010/00/$5.00 DOI: 10.I037t/0021-9010.85.2.273
H. Mellor, ‘Successful Semantics’ in Mellor, Mind, Meaning and Reality (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012).
Fiore, S.M., Smith, C.A.P., and Letsky, M., 2008b. Macrocognition research: challengesand opportunities on the road ahead. In: M. Letsky, N. Warner, S.M. Fiore, andC.A.P. Smith, eds. Macrocognition in teams: theories and methodologies. London: AshgatePublishers, 397–416.
Fiore S. M. (2012). “Cognition and technology: interdisciplinarity and the impact of cognitive engineering research on organizational productivity,” in Oxford Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology ed. Koslowski S., editor. (Oxford: Oxford University Press;) 1306–1322. [Ref list]
Forsyth, D. R. (2014). Group dynamics (6th ed). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning
Fioratou E., Chatzimichailidou M. M., Grant S., Glavin R., Flin R., Trotter C. (2016). Beyond monitors: distributed situation awareness in anaesthesia management. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 17 104–124. 10.1080/1463922X.2015.1106620 [CrossRef].
Galegher, J.R.E.Kraut, and c. Egido,eds. 2009, intellectual teamwork: social and technological foundations of cooperative work. Hillsadale,N.J."Erlbum.
Roma,Peter, Wendy L. Bedwell, "Key Factors and Threats to Team Dynamics in Long-Duration Extreme Environments" In Team Dynamics Over Time. Published online: 07 Aug 2017; 155-187.
Goldstein,E. Bruce,(2011)Cognitive Psychology: Connecting Mind,Research, and Everyday Experience,Third Edition, University of Pittsburgh.
Gottman,J.M.,R.Tyson,K.R.Swanson,c.c.swanson,and J. D.Murray.2003. The mathematics of marriage: Dynamic nonlinear models.. Cambridge, Mass:The MIT Press.
Gorman J. C., Cooke N. J., Amazeen P. G. (2010). Training adaptive teams. Hum. Factors 52 295–307. 10.1177/0018720810371689 [PubMed] [CrossRef]
Hoftadter,D.1995.Fluid concept and creative analogies:Computer models of the fundmental.
Holland, J.H.,K.J.Holyoak,R.E.Nisbett,and P.R.T.Thagard.1986.intruduction: processes of inference, learning and discovery. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
Holland, John H. 1995. Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
Sternberg, Robert , Karin Sternberg.(2012) ,Cognitive Psychology ,(6ed.), www.cengage.com/region.
Yammarino, Francis, D. Mumford, Michael, M. Shane, Connelly, Anthony Day,Eric, Gibson, Carter, McIntosh,Tristan, Mulhearn,Tyler. "Leadership Models for Team Dynamics and Cohesion: The Mars Mission" In Team Cohesion: Advances in Psychological Theory, Methods and Practice. Published online: 19 Nov 2015; 213-245.
Kearney, A. R. (2016). Team health and performance in spaceflight habitats: Risks, countermeasures,and research recommendations. NASA Technical Document TM-2016-219274
Kitchin J., Baber C. (2016). A comparison of shared and distributed situation awareness in teams through the use of agent-based modelling. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 17 8–41.
Kosslyin, S.M. G. Ganis,and W.L. Thompson. 2003. mental imagery: Against the nihilistic hypothesis. Trends in Cognitive science 7,109-111.
Kolodner, J.1993. Case-based reasoning. San Mateo, calif.:Morgan Kaufman.
Bechtel,W.,and A.A.Abrahamsen,2002.Conectionism and the mind: parallel processing,dynamics,and evolution in networks.2nd ed.Oxford:Basil Blackwel.
Karwowski W (eds), Advances in Occupational Ergonomics and Safety II, pp 6-603. Proceedings of the Annual International Occupational Ergonomics and Safety Conference, Washington, DC, USA, June 1-4, 1997. IOS.
kunda,Z.1999.Social cognition. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Strategic Management: Challenges and Opportunities in Tying the Knot. Advances in Strategic Management: Cognition and Strategy, 32, 351–370.
Layton, C., Smith, P. J., & McCoy, C. E. (1994). Design of a cooperative problem-solving system for en-route flight planning: An empirical evaluation. Human Factors, 36(1), 94-119.
Leach, J. (2016). Psychological factors in exceptional, extreme and torturous environments. Extreme Physiology & Medicine, 5(1), 7.
Laila van Ments, Jan Treur,Reflections on dynamics, adaptation and control: A cognitive architecture for mental models,Cognitive Systems Research,Volume 70,2021,Pages 1-9,ISSN 1389-0417,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2021.06.004.
Martínez, l., Venkatraman, D.V., Cappa, S., Zollo, M., & Brusoni,S. (2015). Cognitive Neurosciences and Strategic Management: Challenges and Opportunities in Tying the Knot. Advances in Strategic Management: Cognition and Strategy, 32, 351–370.
Nisbett,R.E.2003.The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently …and why. New York: Free Press.
Norman,D.A.2003,.Emotional design:Why we love (or hate) everyday things. New York:Basic Book.
Oately,K.1992.Bestlaid schemes:The psychology of emotions.Cambridge. Cambridge university press.
Perry, Mark J and Macredie, Robert D (2005). Distributed cognition: investigating collaboration in large and highly complex organisational systems.
Powell, T. C., Lovallo, D., & Fox, C. R. (2011). Behavioral Strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 32 (13), 1369–1386.
Pascoe E and Pidgeon N. 1995. Risk orientation in dynamic decision making. In: Caverni JP,Bar-Hillel M, Barron FH, et al. (eds.), Contributions to Decision Making – I. pp 301-21.Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam.
Rogers, Yvonne and Ellis, Judi (1994). Distributed Cognition: an alternative framework for analysing and explaining collaborative working. Published in Journal of Information Technology, 1994, vol 9(2), 119-128...
Rosen M. A. (2010). Collaborative Problem Solving: The Role of Team Knowledge Building Processes and External Representations. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Central Florida; Orlando, FL.
Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kozlowski, S. W. J., Miller, C., Mathieu, J. E., & Vessey, W. B.(2015b). Teams in space exploration: A new frontier for the science of team effectiveness.Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(3), 200_207.
Salas E., Fiore S. M. (eds) (2004). Team Cognition: Understanding the Factors that Drive Process and Performance. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Stanton, Neville A (2016). Distributed situation awareness. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 17(1): 1-7
Scharf,Ted, Charlie Vaught, Pamela Kidd, Lisa Steiner, Kathleen Kowalski, Bill Wiehagen, Lynn Rethi, and Henry Cole(2005),Toward a Typology of Dynamic and Hazardous Work Environments, An abbreviated version of this paper was presented at the National Occupational Injury Research Symposium (NOIRS) 2005, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, October, 2005.
Sundel,S,S.& Sundel,M.(1993). Behavior modification in human services.(3rd ed).New York:sage
Sarafino,E.P.(2012), Applied behavior analysis: Principle and Procedures for Malifging behavior. USA: Wiely.
Suchman L. (1987). Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-machine Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Suchman L. (2007). Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Banich,Marie, J.comp,Rebecca,(2018); 4 edition,Cambridge University Press
Walls, D. M. (2009). Book Review: Kaptelinin, Victor, and Nardi, Bonnie A. (2006). Acting With Technology: Activity Theory and Interaction Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 333 pages. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 23(3), 380–384.
Wilson,R.A.,and F.c.keli,eds.2008.The MIT encyclopedia of the cognition sciences.Cambridge,mass: The MIT Press.
Wilson, K. A., Salas, E., Priest, H. A., & Andrews, D. (2007). Errors in the heat of battle: Taking a closer look at shared cognition breakdowns through teamwork. Human Factors, 49(2),243_256.
Wiese C. W., Pavlas D., Fiore S. M. (2011). “Towards a quantification scheme for external representations in team cognition research,” in Proceedings of 55th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society;) 1437–1441.
askari, A. (2022). The role of distributional cognitive on the performance of teams in dynamic and high-risk environments. Strategic Management Studies of National Defence Studies, 11(45), 270-239.
MLA
ahmad askari. "The role of distributional cognitive on the performance of teams in dynamic and high-risk environments", Strategic Management Studies of National Defence Studies, 11, 45, 2022, 270-239.
HARVARD
askari, A. (2022). 'The role of distributional cognitive on the performance of teams in dynamic and high-risk environments', Strategic Management Studies of National Defence Studies, 11(45), pp. 270-239.
VANCOUVER
askari, A. The role of distributional cognitive on the performance of teams in dynamic and high-risk environments. Strategic Management Studies of National Defence Studies, 2022; 11(45): 270-239.
