Analysis of Matrix Importance -Performance (IPMA) Indicators of Commercialization of Knowledge Based Products with Emphasis on Resistance Economics Policies

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Management

2 Department of entrepreneurship tendency to higher education

3 Department of Management, Aliabad Katoul Branch,Islamic Azad University

4 Department of Management, Babolsar University

Abstract

The process of Commercialization is the transfer of technology or an innovative concept from the idea to the market. Therefore, the importance and priority of time, place and performance in delivering products to the market are important indicators. The present study aims to analyze the importance of the matrix - the performance of the indicators of the commercialization of knowledge based products with emphasis on resilient economy policies in knowledge based companies based on The centers of growth in the north of the country (Golestan and Mazandaran). The purpose of the research is applied and the method of research is of mixed type. The statistical population of the research in the qualitative section includes academic experts and relevant managers and experts in knowledge-based companies and in the small part of the managers and authorities responsible for knowledge-based companies. Sampling was targeted in the qualitative section and in a quantitative random stratified sampling. In the qualitative section, 20 people participated in the interview process and in the small part with 118 people, 97 participants participated as examples. The data gathering tool was a researcher-made interview and interview. To analyze the data, the coding method in the qualitative section and in the small part of the exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were analyzed using SPSS and PLS software. Designed with 7 indicators in commercialization and 5 indicators in resistance economy. Regarding the confirmation of path coefficient, t statistic and p-value, resistance indexes on commercialization have a significant and direct effect. Also, based on the ranking and prioritization results that were performed based on the Matrix-Importance-Performance Analysis (IPMA), the managerial and economic index ranked first in terms of both importance and performance.

Keywords

References

  • فهرست منابع و مآخذ

    الف. فارسی

    • پیغامی، عادل (1393)، درس‎گفتارهای اقتصاد مقاومتی، چاپ دوم، تهران، انتشارات بسیج دانشجویی دانشگاه امام صادق.
    • دهدشتی شاهرخ، زهره ؛ فرج شوشتری‎پور، حمیدرضا (1397)، طراحی مدل تجاری‌سازی کالاهای دانش‌بنیان در صنعت فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات در استان‌های تهران و قم، مجله تحقیقات بازاریابی نوین، دوره 8، شماره پیاپی 29، صص 38-23.
    • روحی فرشمی، فاطمه (۱۳۹۶)، بررسی رابطه اقتصاد مقاومتی و توسعه فرهنگ کارآفرینی در مدارس استان گلستان، کنفرانس ملی پژوهش‌های نوین در مدیریت، اقتصاد و علوم انسانی، کازرون، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد کازرون.
    • عالیپور، علیرضا و همکاران (1396)، ارائه الگوی شرکت‌های زایشی پژوهشی به‌منظور تجاری‌سازی تحقیقات دانشگاهی در مراکز رشد دانشگاهی و پارک علم و فناوری استان مازندران، فصلنامه پژوهشی و برنامه‌ریزی در آموزش عالی، دوره 23، شماره 1، صص 136-115.
    • علی احمدی، علیرضا؛ فروزنده دهکردی، لطف‎الله و عباسی اسفنجانی، حسین (1394) شناسایی ابزارهای حمایتی دولت‌ها برای تجاری‌سازی تحقیقات دانشگاهی، فصلنامه رهیافت، مرکز تحقیقات سیاست‌های علمی کشور، ش 47، صص 56 – 45.
    • علمی، محمد (1388)، روش‌های تجاری‌سازی یافته‌های پژوهشی، اندیشه تجارت، شماره 15، صص 26-12.
    • فکور، بهمن (1383)، تجاری‌سازی نتایج تحقیقات، نشریه رهیافت، شماره 34، زمستان، صص 58-53.

     

    ب. انگلیسی

    • Braun, M. & others.(2015). Getting more Innovation from public Research., European commission, Enterprise Directo General Development, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 372-82.
    • Cho, J. & Lee, J(2013). "Development of a new technology product evaluation model for assessing commercialization opportunities using Delphi method and fuzzy AHP
    •  Farhan J., Kamariah I. & Nasir, M.­ (2015). A review of commercialization tools: university incubators and technology parks. International Journal of Economics and Financial, 5(1),: 223-228.
    • Geuna, A. (2001). The changing rationale for European University research funding: Are there negative unintended consequences? Journal of Economic Issues 35(3), 607-632.
    • Ghanei Rad, M.A. (2004), Science Anachronism, National Research Institute for Science Policy, Tehran.
    • Link, A.N. & Scott, J.T. (2016) "Government as entrepreneur: Evaluating the commercialization success of SBIR projects", Research Policy, 39, pp. 589-601
    • Moon, T.H. & Sohn, S.Y. (2014)."Structural equation model for predicting technology commercialization success index (TCSI)". Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 70, pp. 885–899.
    • Siegel, D. S. & Phan, P. H. (2006). Analyzing the Effectiveness of University Technology Transfer: Implications for Entrepreneurship Education, Available at: http://www.economics.rpi.edu
    • Smith, K. B. & Larimer, C. W. (2015). The Public Policy Theory Primer. 2nd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press
    • Weckowska, D.M. (2015). Learning in university technology transfer offices: transactions-focused and relations-focused approaches to commercialization of academic research. Technovation, 41 & 42, 62–74

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics